• Users Online: 447
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 796-797

Authors' reply to Banerjee et al., Gunasekaran, and Mehra et al.


Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission25-Nov-2021
Date of Decision26-Nov-2021
Date of Acceptance26-Nov-2021
Date of Web Publication29-Dec-2021

Correspondence Address:
Kumar Prabhash
Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/crst.crst_302_21

Get Permissions


How to cite this article:
Noronha V, Ramaswamy A, Prabhash K. Authors' reply to Banerjee et al., Gunasekaran, and Mehra et al. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2021;4:796-7

How to cite this URL:
Noronha V, Ramaswamy A, Prabhash K. Authors' reply to Banerjee et al., Gunasekaran, and Mehra et al. Cancer Res Stat Treat [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 20];4:796-7. Available from: https://www.crstonline.com/text.asp?2021/4/4/796/334231



We are very grateful to Banerjee and Rao,[1] Gunasekaran,[2] and Mehra and Chilukuri[3] for reading our article titled, “Oncologists' perceptions of the need for assessing individual domains in the geriatric assessment and worthwhile outcomes in treating older patients with cancer: A questionnaire-based survey,” published in the last issue of the journal.[4] We agree with all the comments made and would like to again acknowledge that a significant gap exists between the recognition of the need to perform a multidimensional geriatric assessment and the knowledge/ability to implement this in practice.[5] This gap can be bridged by providing basic training in geriatric oncology to as many oncologists as possible and providing extensive training to some. The way forward would be a two-pronged approach: incorporation of geriatric oncology training in the regular oncology curriculum so that all oncologists have some basic understanding of the principles of geriatric oncology and increasing the number of specialized geriatric oncology fellowship training programs, so that there are few geriatric oncologic experts who can potentially lead the field.

We completely agree with Mehra and Chilukuri[2] regarding the need to tailor the geriatric assessment to our patient population, as well as the need for simple and pragmatic tools to perform the geriatric assessment.[6],[7] We are intrigued by the suggestion of Gunasekaran regarding the electronic geriatric assessment; this may solve the myriad problems of space, time, and other logistic difficulties that currently prevent the widespread application of the geriatric assessment in daily oncology practice.[3] Finally, we are in complete agreement with Banerjee and Rao regarding the need for collaborative work.[1] We need to come together to form a geriatric oncology society in India, so that we can help promote the care of older Indian patients with cancer, share experiences, and conduct multicentric studies.[8],[9],[10] To quote the old African saying, “If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.” I hope that we can go far in our quest to improve the care of our older patients with cancer.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Banerjee J, Rao AR. Geriatric Assessment-- A pressing priority for streamlining care for older patients with cancer. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2021;792-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Gunasekaran V. To bridge the last-mile gap. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2021;4:793-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
  [Full text]  
3.
Mehra N, Chilukuri S. Geriatric assessment to improve overall geriatric oncology outcomes: The need of the hour in resource-limited settings. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2021;4:795-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
  [Full text]  
4.
Noronha V, Kalra D, Ramaswamy A, Gattani SC, Menon N, Patil VM, et al. Oncologists' perceptions of the need for assessing individual domains in the geriatric assessment and worthwhile outcomes in treating older patients with cancer: A questionnaire-based survey. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2021;4:492-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
  [Full text]  
5.
Noronha V, Talreja V, Joshi A, Patil V, Prabhash K. Survey for geriatric assessment in practicing oncologists in India. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2019;2:232-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
  [Full text]  
6.
Noronha V, Ramaswamy A, Banavali S, Gattani S, Prabhash K. Ethnocultural inequity in the geriatric assessment. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2020;3:808-13.  Back to cited text no. 6
  [Full text]  
7.
Mehrotra R, Nethan ST, Yadav K. Socio-cultural tailoring of the comprehensive geriatric assessment tool for low- and middle-income countries: The need of the hour. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2021;4:370-3.  Back to cited text no. 7
  [Full text]  
8.
Parikh PM, Chaitanya K, Boppana M, Kumar MS, Shankar K. Geriatric oncology landscape in India – Current scenario and future projections. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2020;3:296-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
  [Full text]  
9.
Kanesvaran R, Chowdhury AR. Paving the way for a bright future for geriatric oncology in India. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2020;3:658.  Back to cited text no. 9
  [Full text]  
10.
Vora AD. Next steps for geriatric oncology in India. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2020;3:659-60.  Back to cited text no. 10
  [Full text]  




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed113    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded11    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal