• Users Online: 276
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 26-34

Preference and Satisfaction with Cancer Institute quality of life questionnaire, (CI - QoL) V. II and EORTC QLQ-C30 Tamil version: An observational study


1 Department of Psycho-Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Fenivi Research Solutions, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Sasikala Athikesavan
Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/crst.crst_218_21

Rights and Permissions

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is an important clinical outcome in oncology and various tools are available for its assessment. The Cancer Institute QoL Questionnaire, Version II (CI-QoL II) is a questionnaire standardized for use in the Indian setting. Objectives: This study was aimed at evaluating the preference for and satisfaction with CI-QoL II and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) (Tamil version) among patients with cancer. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in the Department of Psycho-Oncology of the Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India, in patients with cancer between September and October 2017. Participants were administered the CI-QoL II and EORTC QLQ-C30, questionnaires 15 min apart, and a debriefing interview was conducted to explore relevant, confusing, or upsetting items. Results: A total of 60 participants were included in the study. The mean age was 38 years (range, 18–60). CI-QoL II was preferred by 43% of the patients and EORTC QLQ-C30 by 20%. Around 85% of patients reported satisfaction with both questionnaires, 12% with CI-QoL II, and 3% with EORTC QLQ-C30. In EORTC QLQ-C30, items on daily activities (10%) and leisure activities (10%) were reported as confusing; impact on family (1.7%), social life (1.7%), and financial life (1.7%) were reported as upsetting; need for rest (5%), irritability (5%), daily activities (13.3%), and leisure activities (18.3%) were reported as irrelevant. In CI-QoL, items on dependency on medication (5%) were reported as confusing, spousal support (6.7%), and sex life (5%) were reported as upsetting, and dependency on medication (23.3%), sex life (31.7%), and spousal support (16.7%) were reported as irrelevant. Conclusion: Over twice the number of patients prefer the CI-QoL II questionnaire to EORTC QLQ-C30; more patients are satisfied with CI-QOL II. The CI-QoL II obtains more information on the QoL of patients to facilitate psychological counseling in the clinical setting, whereas EORTC QLQ-C30 is more appropriate in eliciting responses without bias.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed432    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded30    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal